Re: I need some simple encryption.

Why don't you just use HTTPS instead of HTTP?
That would make encryption transparent for your script, i.e. you wouldn't have to care about it.

pelagic

Comment on Re: I need some simple encryption.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: I need some simple encryption. by Anonymous Monk on Aug 26, 2004 at 09:11 UTC
and I intend on telling the people who will be using this to only run it over a secure connection, but I'm realistic It mean https	[reply]
Re^3: I need some simple encryption. by pelagic (Priest) on Aug 26, 2004 at 09:18 UTC
Usually you decide whether your stuff is accessable over http ot only over https. update ok then, let's ask Cap'n Steve: will you be able to enforce ssl / https? pelagic	[reply]
Re^4: I need some simple encryption. by ikegami (Patriarch) on Aug 26, 2004 at 15:04 UTC
I bet he's releasing a module for others to use, in which case the choice of HTTP vs HTTPS is not up to him.	[reply]
Re^4: I need some simple encryption. by PhilHibbs (Hermit) on Aug 26, 2004 at 17:18 UTC
As a developer, I don't always get to choose how my employer deploys the code I develop.	[reply]