in reply to $_="eval eval"; s/a/i/;

Highlight to read:
8 e's are required, so 13 e's may be omitted. I notice that 8+13=21 are all Fibonacci numbers. Is that deliberate?
The first e terminates the regex. The remaining 7 e's produce:
36.95.32 $_ 52.57.46.52.57.46.53.48.46.52.54.46.52.57.46.52.57.46.53.50.46.52.54.4 +6.52.57.46.52.56.46.53.51.46.52.54.46.52.57.46.52.57.46.52.56.46.52.5 +4.46.52.57.46.52.57.46.53.52.46.52.54.46.53.49.46.53.50.46.52.54.46.5 +3.53.46.53.50.46.52.54.46.52.57.46.52.57.46.53.53.46.52.54.46.52.57.4 +6.52.57.46.53.51.46.52.54.46.52.57.46.52.57.46.53.52.46.52.54.46.53.4 +9.46.53.48.46.52.54.46.53.55.46.53.53.46.52.54.46.52.57.46.52.57.46.5 +2.56.46.52.54.46.52.57.46.52.57.46.52.57.46.52.54.46.52.57.46.52.57.4 +6.53.52.46.52.54.46.52.57.46.52.56.46.53.50.46.52.54.46.52.57.46.52.5 +6.46.52.57.46.52.54.46.52.57.46.52.57.46.53.50.46.52.54.46.53.49.46.5 +3.48.46.52.54.46.53.54.46.52.56.46.52.54.46.52.57.46.52.56.46.52.57.4 +6.52.54.46.52.57.46.52.57.46.53.50.46.52.54.46.52.57.46.52.56.46.53.5 +4.46.52.54.46.53.49.46.53.48.46.52.54.46.52.57.46.52.56.46.53.50.46.5 +2.54.46.53.55.46.53.53.46.52.54.46.53.55.46.53.55.46.52.54.46.52.57.4 +6.52.56.46.53.53.46.52.54.46.52.57.46.52.56.46.52.57.46.52.54.46.52.5 +7.46.52.57.46.53.50.46.52.54.46.53.55.46.53.48.46.52.54.46.52.57.46.5 +2.57.46.52.56.46.52.54.46.53.49.46.53.50.46.52.54.46.53.49.46.53.48.4 +6.52.54.46.53.49.46.53.48.46.51.50.46.51.50.46.57 49.49.50.46.49.49.52.46.49.48.53.46.49.49.48.46.49.49.54.46.51.52.46.5 +5.52.46.49.49.55.46.49.49.53.46.49.49.54.46.51.50.46.57.55.46.49.49.4 +8.46.49.49.49.46.49.49.54.46.49.48.52.46.49.48.49.46.49.49.52.46.51.5 +0.46.56.48.46.49.48.49.46.49.49.52.46.49.48.56.46.51.50.46.49.48.52.4 +6.57.55.46.57.57.46.49.48.55.46.49.48.49.46.49.49.52.46.57.50.46.49.4 +9.48.46.51.52.46.51.50.46.51.50.32.32.9 112.114.105.110.116.34.74.117.115.116.32.97.110.111.116.104.101.114.32 +.80.101.114.108.32.104.97.99.107.101.114.92.110.34.32.32 print"Just another Perl hacker\n" 1

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: $_="eval eval"; s/a/i/;
by o0lit3 (Friar) on Sep 01, 2004 at 14:23 UTC
    ... Fibonacci numbers. Is that deliberate?

    Wow, very perceptive, jdalbec! The use of Fibonacci numbers is not coincidental; it's a sort of signature that I use in a lot of my obfuscated code. I meant for it to be a hidden element, but there you go finding it as the first replier!

    I (foolishy) started all this nonsense after posting my first obfuscation, Fibonacci, before becoming a member. The use of Fibonacci numbers in this particular obfuscation is (in all honesty) quite silly.