in reply to Re: First japh - a bit silly
in thread First japh - a bit silly
Not sure if I've missed the point here, but I can't get that to run without some spurious errors:
Possible attempt to separate words with commas at - line 14. Use of uninitialized value in substitution (s///) at - line 2. Use of uninitialized value in substitution (s///) at - line 2.
(This is with v5.8.0 on Unix and v5.8.4 on Win2K.)
I've done another modification to the original, which gets the \n, and removes the silly stuff:
use strict; $==0;eval q;\$uhJ;;$@=~s^\^^\\^;eval join q,,,map{$=-=0b111x2-ord;$@=~m;^.{$=}(.);;$1}qw $u ; Q c S % N Q K Y V < = x ) g 9 W L P P Z : ? g 8 @ l T U 5 2 } 1 $;
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: First japh - a bit silly
by muntfish (Chaplain) on Sep 08, 2004 at 13:45 UTC | |
|
Re^3: First japh - a bit silly
by jdalbec (Deacon) on Sep 18, 2004 at 17:26 UTC |