Re: SOAP string conversion problem

Parsers will ignore closing tags if they haven't seen an opening tag. I don't know if taking the shortcut you mention is legal, but it will probably work fine.

btw, the proper way to write < in HTML is &lt;, as opposed to & l t ;.

Comment on Re: SOAP string conversion problem Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: SOAP string conversion problem by Hammy (Scribe) on Sep 20, 2004 at 18:12 UTC
Thanks for getting back to me so quickly. I am not sure what shortcut I took. As for ignoring closing tags - the opening tags are there, the parser just converts them. How do I get it to recognize and convert both tags?	[reply]
Re^3: SOAP string conversion problem by ikegami (Patriarch) on Sep 20, 2004 at 18:42 UTC
I was trying to say the > don't need to be escaped because <...> will not be confused as <...>. The library takes the shortcut of not escaping >s to save time and to reduce the size of the output.	[reply]
Re^4: SOAP string conversion problem by Hammy (Scribe) on Sep 20, 2004 at 19:07 UTC
Thanks, this soap stuff is all new to me and I am just starting to understand everything about it. Thanks for the info.	[reply]