in reply to Re^2: RSS feed fixed
in thread RSS feed fixed

I think RSS-formatted ticker feeds would differ from their current format(s) only syntactically. Semantically, the XML tickers re-invent the RSS wheel (in part; RSS is a (semantic) superset of the XML tickers).

I'd recommend conforming to RSS 2.0, because it's (allegedly) backward-compatible with 0.92, which is in turn backward-compatible with 0.91... And 0.91/0.92 are the de facto standards for RSS.

Here's a good article by perl monger Jonathan Eisenzopf: Making Headlines with RSS.

I haven't checked it out, but there is a XML::RSS module which supposedly makes RSS generation easier.

btw - If you're seriously considering this proposal, you might also be interested in another, "better" standard for syndication, the Atom protocol. Some blog sites, such as LiveJournal, support Atom, and it may supplant RSS as the de facto standard for syndication.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: RSS feed fixed
by demerphq (Chancellor) on Sep 21, 2004 at 16:44 UTC

    I dont know that ill have the time to pore over a bunch of standards documents for this. Couldn't you just abstract the relevent info needed for me? Such as what a current ticker already does and how you expect it to look under 'RSS' mode? Personally id be much more likely to do the legwork on this if it doesnt involve reading a bunch of docs.


    ---
    demerphq

      First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
      -- Gandhi

      Flux8


[reply]
      For starters, the following stereotypical Newest Nodes stream...
      Read more... (6 kB)
[reply]
[d/l]
[select]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion