in reply to nested combinations: algorithm advice?

Without further adieu, ...

Please! More adieu?

Update: My guess as to the relationship between the inputs and the outputs is:

Produce 1 random pairing of the inputs for each input; where the pairings contain at least one sub element in common?

Examine what is said, not who speaks.
"Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham
"Think for yourself!" - Abigail
"Memory, processor, disk in that order on the hardware side. Algorithm, algorithm, algorithm on the code side." - tachyon
  • Comment on Re: nested combinations: algorithm advice?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: nested combinations: algorithm advice?
by Jasper (Chaplain) on Sep 22, 2004 at 10:50 UTC
    Produce 1 random pairing of the inputs for each input; where the pairings contain at least one sub element in common?

    It's good, but it's not right</roy walker>

    I don't think there's anything random about it at all. I've added some more lines into the DATA, and still think my guess is right.

    edit: after a bit of googling for Roy Walker, I changed from "it's close, but it's not right." I really think I should have more important things to worry about.
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom