Re^6: An object replacing itself

None of my objects contains a reference to itself. One object contains a reference to the objects that come after it in a collection. When the next object is loaded, the list is shortened by one and transferred over.

Comment on Re^6: An object replacing itself

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: An object replacing itself by diotalevi (Canon) on Sep 23, 2004 at 22:11 UTC
That still makes the object a container object. They should only be there if they are intrinsic to the object. If they don't belong to it, they shouldn't be in its possession.	[reply]
Re^8: An object replacing itself by ryantate (Friar) on Sep 23, 2004 at 22:21 UTC
... in your opinion ;-> I see what you're saying, I have to think about whether I agree. I don't think it's nearly as clear cut as to be objectively called "better," but maybe I'll change my mind :-] Thanks again.	[reply]