Re^4: Too much Front Paging

There is a way of finding which nodes have been answered less. Go to Seekers of Perl Wisdom and look where it says the number of replies.

Sure, it could be more convenient. But we also get few enough questions that it isn't hard to do this manually. If you do not know the answer to a problem that you want answered, you can sometimes get an answer by just posting about it in chatter. If a few knowledgeable monks do that regularly then virtually everyone will get a reply. (Not that that seems to be a problem. In the last 100 approved questions, all have answers.)

Comment on Re^4: Too much Front Paging

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Too much Front Paging by tachyon (Chancellor) on Sep 24, 2004 at 16:07 UTC
Yeah, I appreciate the primary reply count on SOPW. It is on the FP too. As you may have gathered I like short and punchy, just the facts, exec summary, yada yade. I just don't agree with all the front paging. I make the following assertions: With a normal distribution of quality the greater the number of FP nodes the lower the average quality. Less is more. If a large number of nodes hit the FP then it is just another site index. Less is more. For infrequent visitors FP node quality will be inversly proportional to FP node turnover. Less is more. For infrequent visitors the FP will not appear static if turnover > visit_freq. Less is more. Less is more cheers tachyon	[reply]
Re^5: Too much Front Paging by demerphq (Chancellor) on Sep 24, 2004 at 17:24 UTC
There is a way of finding which nodes have been answered less. Go to Seekers of Perl Wisdom and look where it says the number of replies. Its probably easier to do this via demerphq's sandpit or whatever it will be called once its taken out of test. At least for newer nodes anyway. --- demerphq _{First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Gandhi Flux8}	[reply]