Re^2: Does the monastery want a threaded newest nodes?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Does the monastery want a threaded newest nodes? by davido (Cardinal) on Sep 25, 2004 at 18:23 UTC
I don't see the depth-by-section setting, and would really like such a feature. For example, next to the Discussion section heading, I would like a "Set depth" dropdown. And likewise next to each section heading. That way I could reduce the max depth on a per-section basis. I'm not keen on multiple font sizes, but bold is fine for nodes less than, say, 1/4th of the "xx days" setting. I do like that the threads are collapsable. I wouldn't mind seeing them collapsed by default, and an asterisk if there are responses within a certain timeframe. ...just a few thoughts. ;) Oh, and the whole thing looks pretty bad on PDA screens like the Zaurus, but I don't think there's much that can be done about that. ...As long as we keep the old version of Newest Nodes around as an option, that will be fine. Dave	[reply]
Re^3: Does the monastery want a threaded newest nodes? by bart (Canon) on Sep 26, 2004 at 08:59 UTC
What I'd like to see there too — or even more, is the age of a node. Granted, I can see when a node is posted when hovering over the link with the mouse, but it's not that handy. I was thinking of a format not unlike the "last here" time on user's homenodes: "3 minutes ago", "1 hour ago", "4 weeks ago" — though it could be a bit more compact: "3m", "1h", or "4w" respectively.	[reply]
Re^4: Does the monastery want a threaded newest nodes? by demerphq (Chancellor) on Sep 26, 2004 at 09:30 UTC
It needs better styling (suggestions solicited) but age and time are optionally displayed now. --- demerphq _{First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Gandhi Flux8}	[reply]