in reply to Creating a new variable named the contents of another

You're grasping for a hash. You could use soft references for that, but you shouldn't.

The reason it won't work with lexicals is because they're not in the symbol table, while globals are. (If you don't fully understand that, you need to read more from the Camel book.)

Being right, does not endow the right to be rude; politeness costs nothing.
Being unknowing, is not the same as being stupid.
Expressing a contrary opinion, whether to the individual or the group, is more often a sign of deeper thought than of cantankerous belligerence.
Do not mistake your goals as the only goals; your opinion as the only opinion; your confidence as correctness. Saying you know better is not the same as explaining you know better.

I shouldn't have to say this, but any code, unless otherwise stated, is untested

  • Comment on Re: Creating a new variable named the contents of another

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Creating a new variable named the contents of another
by Fletch (Bishop) on Sep 27, 2004 at 14:06 UTC