in reply to Re^5: Distribution of Levels and Writeups (sig)
in thread Distribution of Levels and Writeups
I ++'d. To paraphrase a dead old lady: the only evil thought is the refusal to think.
I'll take a bite at why I think they're less than useful.
I like Fossas and you should too.
I like Fossas and you should too.
I like Fossas and you should too.
I like Fossas and you should too.
I like Fossas and you should too.
I like Fossas and you should too.
I like Fossas and you should too.
I like Fossas and you should too.
I like Fossas and you should too.
I like Fossas and you should too.
I like Fossas and you should too.
I like Fossas and you should too.
I like Fossas and you should too.
I like Fossas and you should too.
I like Fossas and you should too.
I like Fossas and you should too.
I like Fossas and you should too.
I like Fossas and you should too.
I like Fossas and you should too.
I like Fossas and you should too.
Conceptualizing the point:
Repetitive filler that would be consistently downvoted as anything else; like an OT SOPW that was 10 lines long without a point and then got posted again. And again. And...for ( 1 .. 1_819 ) { show_same_sig(); }
I don't have a personal preference (they're easy to ignore and some vanity features are nice for the personality they convey) but the site already offers a user page without any real content or size restrictions. Personal statements, preferences, loves, philosophies, especially those that haven't changed in a year, or two, might sit better there.
|
|---|