in reply to Maintaining module reviews

My suggestion is that you update the review so that it reads the way you'd write it now, but include at the end the parts that your deleted and/or a description of what you changed or whatever so that at least most of the original review can be inferred from the updated review.

If the two reviews are completely different, then perhaps two review nodes that link to each other would be okay.

- tye        

  • Comment on Re: Maintaining module reviews (update)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Maintaining module reviews (update)
by rinceWind (Monsignor) on Oct 08, 2004 at 10:57 UTC