in reply to Re: RFC - A multi table SQL Builder
in thread RFC - A multi table SQL Builder

You could do that right now by doing:
select => [ 'A.foo AS foo', 'E.bar AS bar', ],
which is what we do. However, I can definitely see adding different kinds of APIs, so that different SQL flavors can be supported. Thanks!

Being right, does not endow the right to be rude; politeness costs nothing.
Being unknowing, is not the same as being stupid.
Expressing a contrary opinion, whether to the individual or the group, is more often a sign of deeper thought than of cantankerous belligerence.
Do not mistake your goals as the only goals; your opinion as the only opinion; your confidence as correctness. Saying you know better is not the same as explaining you know better.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: RFC - A multi table SQL Builder
by jplindstrom (Monsignor) on Oct 18, 2004 at 14:11 UTC
    Ok. I just wasn't sure you had that covered :)

    Other than the SQL dialect issue, I don't really see any advantage of my suggested syntax over yours.

    /J