Re^4: Musing on Monastery Content

Though you know, in society, one has a right to trial, and at least notionally, the opportunity to influence the lawmakers and even change the laws. I do not see any similar mechanisms here.

You read it somewhere? PLease show me.

It might be a language thingie and I could have understood this completly wrong (please tell me if so), but I think it's pretty obvious how and where such mechanism exist on this site.

For one everyone is able to speak his/her mind and defend oneself (so much for the trial). Also there's a section Perl Monks Discussion and I wonder what good it where if there won't be the notional opportunity to change the "laws".

I understood the word "notional" as "in theory".

(comment about me better shut up, because of not being long enough registered with this site, omitted)

cheers, Golo

Comment on Re^4: Musing on Monastery Content

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Musing on Monastery Content by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Oct 21, 2004 at 03:48 UTC
Responded to offline. Examine what is said, not who speaks. "Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham "Think for yourself!" - Abigail "Memory, processor, disk in that order on the hardware side. Algorithm, algorithm, algorithm on the code side." - tachyon	[reply]