in reply to Dynamically assigning number of for loops?

I'm not clear whether the words or the table better convey(s) your intent:

"The number assigned to X is always more than the numbers assigned to variables in the first set."

but lines 0, 2, 3, 4 & 5 (inter alia) do not appear to satisfy the quoted rule. (By some chance, is the table you provided merely like "greek type" -- a filler that shows layout before actual content is available?)
  • Comment on Re: Dynamically assigning number of for loops?