in reply to Re^3: Sainthood via Seniority Simulation
in thread Sainthood via Seniority Simulation

This node falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
  • Comment on Re^4: Sainthood via Seniority Simulation

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Sainthood via Seniority Simulation
by Anonymous Monk on Oct 25, 2004 at 14:37 UTC
    Do you think the number of posts on perlmonks should explode, with the majority of the posts being Me too (for the up-voters speaking up) and Me not (for the down-voters speaking up)?
[reply]

      Certainly not, but I'd like to hear why or how do people disagree. If someone posts an incorrect advice you don't just downvote it, you post a correction.

      Jenda
      We'd like to help you learn to help yourself
      Look around you, all you see are sympathetic eyes
      Stroll around the grounds until you feel at home
         -- P. Simon in Mrs. Robinson

[reply]
        I downvoted it because I felt it was way off-topic.

        Instead of a general discussion about the informedness of voters, it turned into a discussion of some election in a far-away country, ie. into a discussion of some (I guess) political commentators whom I don't know - and probably have absolutely no reason to wish to know more about.

[reply]
        A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

In Section Perl Monks Discussion