in reply to shared memory and objects
Also, you might want to look at threading your application. It's basically multi-process, but data is shared by default, not unshared by default. Of course, there's a host of new problems that goes along with that, but if you want to ...
Another option is to use SOAP or XML-RPC or some other client/server option. I do that with XML-RPC and it works out really great.
Being right, does not endow the right to be rude; politeness costs nothing.
Being unknowing, is not the same as being stupid.
Expressing a contrary opinion, whether to the individual or the group, is more often a sign of deeper thought than of cantankerous belligerence.
Do not mistake your goals as the only goals; your opinion as the only opinion; your confidence as correctness. Saying you know better is not the same as explaining you know better.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: shared memory and objects
by perrin (Chancellor) on Oct 26, 2004 at 04:23 UTC |