in reply to Re: A Proposal for Additional Levels
in thread A Proposal for Additional Levels

I don't want to lose my 40 votes because that reduces their usefullness as read/unread markers. Sometimes my votes are no more meaningful than "I've seen this node."

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: A Proposal for Additional Levels
by demerphq (Chancellor) on Oct 26, 2004 at 15:26 UTC

    Frankly i think thats one of the worse excuses for having 40 votes that ive ever heard.

    You're in PMDev, figure out a smarter way to do that.


    ---
    demerphq

      First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
      -- Gandhi

      Flux8


[reply]
Re^3: A Proposal for Additional Levels
by belg4mit (Prior) on Oct 26, 2004 at 15:33 UTC
    Browser history.

    --
    I'm not belgian but I play one on TV.

[reply]
      That only works if you are willing to suffer with a note depth of 0 (if that even works).
[reply]
        Not really, if you can t remember the notes you've read you can check their dates against the last visit date for the top level node in your history (which you obviously cache before revisiting the page). Or you could use newest nodes. :-P

        --
        I'm not belgian but I play one on TV.

[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion