Re: Adding sessions on-the-fly to POE program

I thought that sessions with no name/alias and no further tasks pending quit. So the one session capable of handling a irc_001 message should have already exited by the time that message is thrown. I think your _start method will have to give the session a name so it will hang around to handle the irc_001 message.

Comment on Re: Adding sessions on-the-fly to POE program

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Adding sessions on-the-fly to POE program by revdiablo (Prior) on Oct 27, 2004 at 16:38 UTC
I thought that sessions with no name/alias and no further tasks pending quit. POE::Component::IRC's `register` state increments the refcount on the calling session, which would also have kept it alive also. japhy's only problem was that he posted `register` from the POE::Component::Server::TCP session, so the events (and the refcount increment) were going there instead. PS: I know this is a bit after the fact and a bit off-topic, but I figure the more we talk about POE the better. The Monastery seems to have a dearth of discussion about POE, which I think is a shame.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^2: Adding sessions on-the-fly to POE program by japhy (Canon) on Oct 26, 2004 at 20:34 UTC
Hmm, no, that doesn't help. The problem I'm encountering is this: if I create a POE::Component::IRC object after I've created the POE::Session object, it doesn't interact. _____________________________________________________ Jeff `japhy` Pinyan, P.L., P.M., P.O.D, X.S.: Perl, regex, and `perl` hacker How can we ever be the sold short or the cheated, we who for every service have long ago been overpaid? ~~ Meister Eckhart	[reply]