in reply to Re: object-relational Perl programming: best practice or compromise?
in thread object-relational Perl programming: best practice or compromise?

This link it often cited in converstations about this topic, but I think maybe it needs to be updated to really stay useful. I think the page footer says it all.

Generated from Id: poop-comparison.pod,v 1.35 2003/09/30 15:47:47 autarch Exp.
I have found the latest updated POD in the sourceforge CVS repository (only 8 hours old), however, it seems these revisions have not made it onto the main page.

There also does seem to be some spotted activity on the poop-group list. I haven't waded through it myself, but you might find some interesting stuff there.

-stvn
  • Comment on Re^2: object-relational Perl programming: best practice or compromise?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: object-relational Perl programming: best practice or compromise?
by autarch (Hermit) on Oct 27, 2004 at 16:22 UTC

    The updates aren't on the main page because I was waiting for some clarification from Tony Bowden on Class::DBI, and waiting for a new version of Terrance's patch.

    Updates would happen more often if people sent patches more often ;)