Re^2: Why isn't C<use strict> the default?

in reply to Re: Why isn't C<use strict> the default?
in thread Why isn't C<use strict> the default?

This argument doesn't addresss the fact that one could arrange it so perl would turn on strict and warnings for code from any other source than -e but leave -e code unencumbered.

---
demerphq

_{First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.

-- Gandhi

Flux8}

Comment on Re^2: Why isn't C<use strict> the default?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Why isn't C<use strict> the default? by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Oct 29, 2004 at 08:20 UTC
Or you could have another name for the binary that makes `perl` assume `use strict;` (and maybe warnings also)… `#!/usr/bin/perls no swine;` [download] Makeshifts last the longest.	[reply] [d/l] [select]

In Section Meditations