Re^5: Why isn't C<use strict> the default?

I still think PASCAL was a great language to teach me some good habits as a programming neophyte.

For any actual task I have to do nowadays I wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole.

Makeshifts last the longest.

Comment on Re^5: Why isn't C<use strict> the default?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Why isn't C<use strict> the default? by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Oct 29, 2004 at 08:51 UTC
Read the whole thread, or at least my contributions. I am not advocating any change to the language. none; nada; zip; zilch; nothing; not one iota; not a lot! So what the F*** does pascal have to with the price of bread? Examine what is said, not who speaks. "Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham "Think for yourself!" - Abigail "Memory, processor, disk in that order on the hardware side. Algorithm, algorithm, algorithm on the code side." - tachyon	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^6: Why isn't C<use strict> the default?
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Oct 29, 2004 at 08:51 UTC

Read the whole thread, or at least my contributions.

I am not advocating any change to the language. none; nada; zip; zilch; nothing; not one iota; not a lot!

So what the F*** does pascal have to with the price of bread?

Examine what is said, not who speaks.

"Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham
"Think for yourself!" - Abigail
"Memory, processor, disk in that order on the hardware side. Algorithm, algorithm, algorithm on the code side." - tachyon

[reply]