in reply to Conditional many to many relationships with Class::DBI
There are a few ways to solve the problem. The first is to maintain a history table that tracks all the changes and your main table only has the most current data. This, however, doesn't really allow you to do reports backwards in time. No good.
The second solution is to change your thinking. This isn't a many-to-many relationship - it's a many-to-many-to-many relationship. Your primary key has shifted from (User, Group) to (User, Group, LegalDateRange), and you need to change your thinking based on that shift.
I don't know how to solve the CDBI issue as I've never really used it. However, that is the root cause of the problem you're having.
Being right, does not endow the right to be rude; politeness costs nothing.
Being unknowing, is not the same as being stupid.
Expressing a contrary opinion, whether to the individual or the group, is more often a sign of deeper thought than of cantankerous belligerence.
Do not mistake your goals as the only goals; your opinion as the only opinion; your confidence as correctness. Saying you know better is not the same as explaining you know better.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: Conditional many to many relationships with Class::DBI
by CountZero (Bishop) on Nov 01, 2004 at 19:41 UTC |