in reply to Re: Missing something with regards to references
in thread Missing something with regards to references
It sort of make sense to me, but this is entirely new territory for me. I'd had a hunch at one time that the undef keys beneath the one I wanted would be a problem, but I couldn't quite wrap myself around what could be done about it. Using the reference rather than copies of values sort of makes sense too, but I think it needs time to sink in. I think the part about using $_[0] instead of shift makes the least sense to me... since I am always pathing through a reference, I apparently need to make a reference to the reference?
Anyway, thank you. This is very helpful.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: Missing something with regards to references
by iblech (Friar) on Nov 03, 2004 at 10:47 UTC |