Re^2: Missing something with regards to references

in reply to Re: Missing something with regards to references
in thread Missing something with regards to references

This is very elegant and makes much more sense to me, so thank you dpuu. But given some of the points that blokhead raised, are there any other gotchas with this approach I should be concerned about?

Comment on Re^2: Missing something with regards to references

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Missing something with regards to references by dpuu (Chaplain) on Nov 02, 2004 at 00:39 UTC
I don't think so: my explicit default-assignment should avoid any autovivication issues. --Dave Opinions my own; statements of fact may be in error.	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom