in reply to Re^2: let's have valid html
in thread let's have valid html
I'm no expert, but theorbittwo's assessment sounds about right to me. All in all there are some pretty weighty changes.
For example, check out this little gem from the xhtml FAQ...
Is <img> being replaced by <object> in XHTML2?
No. <img> is being replaced in XHTML2, but by something else ...
What XHTML2 does is say that all images are equivalent to some piece of content; it does this by allowing you to put a src attribute on any element at all. What this says is: if the image is available, and the browser can process it, use it, otherwise use the content of the element. For instance:...
Take a look at the elements in xhtml2 to get a sense of how much has changed.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^4: let's have valid html
by apotheon (Deacon) on Nov 18, 2004 at 10:54 UTC |