in reply to Re: Running a process in the background
in thread Running a process in the background

IPC::Open2 and IPC::Open3 use system 1 on Windows, and fork elsewhere (as appropriate), so I usually recommend these.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Running a process in the background
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Nov 23, 2004 at 23:54 UTC

    I have to disagree with that as a default recommendation for the OPs stated requirement.

    If you need the complexity of those--Ie. You need to be able to intereact with the background process's input and output streams--that is a fine recommendation, but for simply running a processes in the background?

    Neither is exactly the easiest of modules to use, and the documentation of both leaves a lot to be desired.

    That one reverses the order of the first two parameters relative to the other is confusing enough. I can never remember, or work out from the descriptions whether *RDRFH is a handle for reading, from the perspective of the perl script, or that of the command being run? I end up trying it to find out.

    That the descriptions are entirely geared to their use in a *nix environment, with most of the description being deferred to man page references and useage with *nix utilities, mean I would avoid recommending the use of either to a win32 user, without there being a definite need to do so.


    Examine what is said, not who speaks.
    "But you should never overestimate the ingenuity of the sceptics to come up with a counter-argument." -Myles Allen
    "Think for yourself!" - Abigail        "Time is a poor substitute for thought"--theorbtwo         "Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham
    "Memory, processor, disk in that order on the hardware side. Algorithm, algorithm, algorithm on the code side." - tachyon