in reply to Re: Dotted hash access
in thread Dotted hash access
If I were going to make a dialect, I'd probably throw in a%hash«Foo»«Bar»«Baz»
which would let me writeuse supersubscripts;
instead to mean the same thing. But it's not clear that something like that should be inflicted on everyone unless the syntax were less likely to be confusing to someone who really means%hash«Foo/Bar/Baz»
to mean a single key with slashes in it. It would need a more distinctive prefix if we were to build it in, and unfortunately we're really low on bracket characters, even with the addition of «», which we've already found lots of uses for. (Some would say too many... :-)%hash{'Foo/Bar/Baz'}
So the answer to your question is probably "no" for now...
|
|---|