in reply to •Re: Convert script to use MySQL
in thread Convert script to use MySQL

There's no reason in my mind to continue to use MySQL except for legacy (software or people).

How about performance?

I'm working with a system that essentially does OLAP with a lot of updates. PostgreSQL (7.3.4) works great for it in theory, but in practice the system bogs down over a relatively short period of time (a few hours), and way down over the course of a day. We have to stop and vacuum the database nightly. A vaguely similar system I've worked on that uses MySQL (4.0.something with InnoDB tables) didn't suffer the same degradation.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Convert script to use MySQL
by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Nov 27, 2004 at 01:35 UTC

    I've seen the same thing. I understand Postgres has addressed this issue in current versions but the version I was just doing contract work with (a year old I think) had memory leaks that meant it had to be restarted just about daily b/c the performance would spiral down to almost nothing. The MySQL I was working with 3 years ago had no trouble driving up to 10 million page views a day of data from a couple dozen different tables and I didn't admin it but I don't recall it needed restarting often if ever.