in reply to Re^5: Pearls (not really) of Perl programming
in thread Pearls (not really) of Perl programming

You're right, thanks for correction.

I just could not resist to point out for general idea (I saw that in p5p list) but I forgot to recheck all details

But once we decided to be precise, let me make additional correction.
Requirement to return '-1', '0' and '+1' is too restrictive. According to perldoc -f sort:

parison order. If SUBNAME is specified, it gives the name of a subroutine that returns an integer less than, equal to, or greater than 0, depending on how the elements of the list are to be ordered. (The "<=>" and "cmp" operators are extremely useful in such routines.) SUBNAME may be a scalar variable
So any negative and positive values are ok.

Best regards,
Courage, the Cowardly Dog