in reply to Is Perl Truly an Object Oriented Language?

I have this marketing detector. The word "truly" trips it every time.

Perl's OO syntax was addeded rather later than most of its other features. Sometims this shows. There's a loose default recommendation for how to "do" OO in Perl, but it's certainly not indisputable and some people indeed write OO Perl and avoid the regular object system. As always with Perl, there's more than one way to do it, and that doesn't mean you can't do it.

Tell us what you want to do more specifically.

  • Comment on Re: Is Perl Truly an Object Oriented Language?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Is Perl Truly an Object Oriented Language?
by Cap'n Steve (Friar) on Dec 03, 2004 at 07:04 UTC
    Well, I'm no expert, but when I see "Object Oriented Language" I think of (please don't down vote me for using this ;)) Visual Basic.
      I guess this was a joke (sorry if not), but you should think "Ruby" or "Smalltalk". C++ and Java have some OO in them, but are not pure.