in reply to Another japh (my 1st one)

First level:
$\=q.,.; $_=q.print' ,\g,,( w,a'c'e'h,,map{$_-=qif/g/;chr }107. . q[..117,q)[map+hex,split//,join' ,2B,, w$ECDF078D3' F9'5F3014$,$,];]; #{local $\=$/;print;} $\.=$/; s,q,32,g; #{local $\=$/;print;} s,g,112,g; #{local $\=$/;print;} y,' , q,; #do {local $\=$/;print;} or eval;
Second level:
$\=q.,., $\.=$/, print qq,\112, # "J" ,(qw,a c e h,,map{$_-=32if/112/;chr}107..117,32) # ("a","c","e","h","k","l","m","n","o","P","q","r","s","t","u"," ") # 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F [map+hex,split//,join q,2B,,qw$ECDF078D3 F9 5F3014$,$,]; # ECDF078D32BF92B5F30142B # ust another Perl hacker
I especially like the dual use of 112 (octal J and decimal p). ++

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Another japh (my 1st one)
by blazar (Canon) on Dec 10, 2004 at 13:55 UTC
    "I especially like the dual use of 112 (octal J and decimal p)" Indeed I like(d) it too, albeit purely coincidental. Now I'm thinkering wether something similar could be made to work on a more systematic basis... Hmmm I doubt so, but who knows?