in reply to RE: Who owns your words? A resolution is needed.
in thread Who owns your words? A resolution is needed.

I generally agree with everything you've mentioned, with the exception of the /anon command. I am very opposed to something like that. For all practical purposes, it would be the same as allowing Anonymous Monk to use the chatterbox. I'm all for freedom of speech, but there has to be accountability.

--Chris

e-mail jcwren
  • Comment on (jcwren) RE: (2) Who owns your words? A resolution is needed.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: (jcwren) RE: (2) Who owns your words? A resolution is needed.
by Albannach (Monsignor) on Nov 13, 2000 at 23:48 UTC
    I take your point and agree, but I was torn as to whether I'd rather get a good contribution from anon than no contribution from a nervous monk. Note that it isn't quite an anon monk, as you'd have to be registered to do it, and so you'd be one of the monks in the on-line list. I guess that pretty much destroys that idea right there!
[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion