tphyahoo has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:
and get a bunch of output while the module attempts to install. Many lines of the output read something likecpan install stuff::thing
Then scary messages like "no response from server, trying again." And in the end, everything works. At least, everything has worked so far.subroutine _STUFF redefined at /dir/dir/dir line 1234
But when my computer casually tells me that hundreds of functions are being redefined, I worry a bit. What's up with that? Am I being paranoid? Should I learn to love CPAN and not sweat the details?
Or should I back up my installation before every new grab from CPAN?
Here are more questions, while my cpan install grinds on, and my mind glazes over pondering the CPAN voodoo.
1) When should I use
and when should I use cpan install?make make test make install
2) How long should I give CPAN install to succeed, before giving up? The error message I usually get many many many times, before it finally succeeds is usually
3) My original question, are these "redefined function" actions of cpan dangerous?connecting to ftp.server.com logging in as anonymous, okay, okay, okay (skipped some stuff here) ..... ==> PORT ... Error in server response, closing control connection. Retrying.
Thanks for your wisdom!
thomas.
PS In this specific case it is log::log4perl, but this overall behavior is pretty constant with cpan, in my experience. PPS Here is my attempt at a google search to do my own research on the problem, but it didn't get me too far:
http://www.google.de/search?hl=de&q=cpan+%22error+in+server+response%22&btnG=Google-Suche&meta=
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: CPAN "install" redefines bunches of stuff. Should I worry?
by pernod (Chaplain) on Dec 14, 2004 at 15:05 UTC | |
|
Re: CPAN "install" redefines bunches of stuff. Should I worry?
by mpeters (Chaplain) on Dec 14, 2004 at 15:48 UTC | |
|
Progress, but no solution
by tphyahoo (Vicar) on Dec 14, 2004 at 14:58 UTC | |
|
Re: CPAN "install" redefines bunches of stuff. Should I worry?
by Anonymous Monk on Dec 14, 2004 at 15:19 UTC | |
|
Should have been ppm, not cpan.
by tphyahoo (Vicar) on Dec 14, 2004 at 15:57 UTC | |
by saintmike (Vicar) on Dec 14, 2004 at 21:52 UTC | |
|
Problem Solved. Use - not ::
by tphyahoo (Vicar) on Dec 14, 2004 at 16:20 UTC | |
by larryp (Deacon) on Dec 14, 2004 at 19:30 UTC | |
by Animator (Hermit) on Dec 14, 2004 at 18:47 UTC |