Re^5: XML::Fling begone?

As I said before, it would have to be a lot faster, and solve some problem that we have with XML:Fling to be worthwhile. If the benchmarks showed a signifigant time difference then id say at minimum further research would be warranted.

---
demerphq

Comment on Re^5: XML::Fling begone?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: XML::Fling begone? by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Dec 19, 2004 at 18:11 UTC
Ok then, I'll add benchmarking the two vs each other to my TODO. Any suggestions on how to benchmark? I'm thinking I should lift the code from some ticker generator and create an XML::Genx-adapted version to pit against it. Makeshifts last the longest.	[reply]
Re^7: XML::Fling begone? by demerphq (Chancellor) on Dec 19, 2004 at 18:14 UTC
Id say grab the RSS output of the NN ticker and then have the benchmark recreate it with both. Something like that. I wouldnt use live code to start with as I reckon the DB times will swamp the XML production time. I say to use that feed as its probably fairly sizable. --- demerphq	[reply]