in reply to Re^3: P2P Golf: MoleSter
in thread P2P Golf: MoleSter
Huh?!?
The function in question is
sub g{ open(F,'<',$_[1])&&&s($_[0],$a,"e$_[1]",<F>); close F }
On first glance, it looks like you can replace $_[1] with pop for a 2-character savings. However, look at where g() is called - &$3($2,$4,$'). There are three scalars in @_, not two. The fact that g() only uses two is irrelevant.
Being right, does not endow the right to be rude; politeness costs nothing.
Being unknowing, is not the same as being stupid.
Expressing a contrary opinion, whether to the individual or the group, is more often a sign of deeper thought than of cantankerous belligerence.
Do not mistake your goals as the only goals; your opinion as the only opinion; your confidence as correctness. Saying you know better is not the same as explaining you know better.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^5: P2P Golf: MoleSter
by blazar (Canon) on Dec 21, 2004 at 14:39 UTC |