in reply to Re: RFC - Module for Google-like autocompletion
in thread RFC - Module for Google-like autocompletion

I have to confess that I still haven't learned CGI::Application, but it seems I converged on a similar solution to a similar problem... ;-)

I've given a cursory look at CGI::Application and thought it was too complex for my needs. This CGI is really simple: always the same runmode, only three parameters (out of which only one is really important so far), only one line of output... perhaps if I were proficient using CGI::Application I could figure out how to use it quickly for simple scripts like this, without getting intimidated by the multi-runmode multi-stage talk.

  • Comment on Re^2: RFC - Module for Google-like autocompletion

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: RFC - Module for Google-like autocompletion
by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Dec 21, 2004 at 14:23 UTC
    I'm thinking about further applications. For example, I've worked on an application that did reports. Each report had between 8 and 14 parameters to choose from. Most of those were simple drop-down boxes. But, some were searches. You could have more than one searchable parameter on the screen at a time. But, you want the javascript to be simple - so you pass another parameter. That parameter is the runmode you want to use to generate the array(s). That runmode calls a set of standard functions to help it out (like as_string, etc.), but it's still different runmodes.

    Alternatively, this could also serve more than one application in your company. C::A is designed not just for one web application, but to standardize how you build web applications in your company. Oh - and it works seamlessly with mod_perl. :-)

    Being right, does not endow the right to be rude; politeness costs nothing.
    Being unknowing, is not the same as being stupid.
    Expressing a contrary opinion, whether to the individual or the group, is more often a sign of deeper thought than of cantankerous belligerence.
    Do not mistake your goals as the only goals; your opinion as the only opinion; your confidence as correctness. Saying you know better is not the same as explaining you know better.