in reply to Re^2: starting to write automated tests
in thread starting to write automated tests

Aside from the precedence issue pointed out by dragonchild, I have to wonder why you have test 3 at all? Test 1 and 2 already tested both of those conditions. What's the point of testing them again? Might they have suddenly changed between the tests?

  • Comment on Re^3: starting to write automated tests

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: starting to write automated tests
by geektron (Curate) on Dec 28, 2004 at 23:16 UTC
    grr. i hate being in a hurry and forgetting to post, not just preview.

    the first and second tests were there ... so that i could see what was going wrong. it wasn't apparent to me, since this is my first venture into Test::*