While technically true, your comment would be better suited if you explained further why someone should use HTML::Template instead of CGI. Furthermore, what is a "Tal" implementation?
For the record, I know what those things are. But, you're giving an answer to someone who doesn't seem to have a lot of domain experience in the web applications world. You need to explain what you're talking about and why someone should make a radical paradigm shift.
Being right, does not endow the right to be rude; politeness costs nothing. Being unknowing, is not the same as being stupid. Expressing a contrary opinion, whether to the individual or the group, is more often a sign of deeper thought than of cantankerous belligerence. Do not mistake your goals as the only goals; your opinion as the only opinion; your confidence as correctness. Saying you know better is not the same as explaining you know better.
| [reply] |
i'd be careful using CGI, this module is a real good hack, but BIG (using 3,5 mb of your memory when compiled).
It's worth pointing out that whilst it's true that CGI.pm contains a lot code, it also implements a pretty ingenious code loader that it only actually compiles the code that you use. So you shouldn't really worry about loading code that you aren't going to use - CGI.pm is actually pretty efficient.
--
< http://www.dave.org.uk>
"The first rule of Perl club is you do not talk about
Perl club." -- Chip Salzenberg
| [reply] |