in reply to Re: Do we ever want to freeze threads?
in thread Do we ever want to freeze threads?

It's a really tough call .. Originally my thought was to prevent people from replying to a node that was a year or more old. But in addition I suppose it could also be used to prevent someone from modifying (or deleting, as per mt2k) an old node. Then again, updating is OK -- as in, adding something to the bottom.

It's really not black and white, is it.

Alex / talexb / Toronto

"Groklaw is the open-source mentality applied to legal research" ~ Linus Torvalds

  • Comment on Re^2: Do we ever want to freeze threads?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Do we ever want to freeze threads?
by hardburn (Abbot) on Dec 30, 2004 at 16:03 UTC

    What about the Thread Which Shall Not Be Named?

    "There is no shame in being self-taught, only in not trying to learn in the first place." -- Atrus, Myst: The Book of D'ni.

Re^3: Do we ever want to freeze threads?
by eyepopslikeamosquito (Archbishop) on Jul 28, 2023 at 08:31 UTC

    > Originally my thought was to prevent people from replying to a node that was a year or more old

    Excellent thought talexb!

    Only last week a Perl newbie made a most unfortunate boo boo, making an ill-advised reply to a random old post instead of posting a new one. Sadly, perhaps feeling shamed by the opening blunder, our eager new Perl monk seems to have vanished, perhaps never to return. :-(

    Given that I wrote Necroposting Considered Beneficial (and how far you are behind in the race to Chancellor of the Exchequer :) I felt obliged to make a necropost response to your excellent (and deserving of an upvote!) discussion post of 2004. :)

      Yeah, this made me laugh out loud -- a 2004 discussion about freezing threads .. with an update almost twenty years later. :D

      Also interesting to note that just asking the question (my root node) garnered a significant number downvotes. :/ Well, everyone has their own opinion.

      Alex / talexb / Toronto

      Thanks PJ. We owe you so much. Groklaw -- RIP -- 2003 to 2013.

        > Also interesting to note that just asking the question (my root node) garnered a significant number downvotes. :/

        I think the unfortunate downvotes simply reflect a (positive IMHO) change in Perl Monks culture over the years. I doubt that would happen if you posted that node today.

        To illustrate my point, On Interfaces and APIs in 2006 garnered a significant number of downvotes ... which I doubt would occur if I posted it today ... of course, it would also receive far fewer upvotes. :) The blockbuster centurion nodes at Perl Monks appear to be a thing of the past:

        • Terrifying Beauty - though Erudil wrote only thirteen nodes in eight years, every single one of them earned 100+ rep!

        Update: see also: Experience Point References and Pranks

      Only last week a Perl newbie made a most unfortunate boo boo, making an ill-advised reply to a random old post instead of posting a new one.

      tbh I'm a little disappointed that no one thought to consider it for promotion to root node. :-(

      Today's latest and greatest software contains tomorrow's zero day exploits.