in reply to Re^3: Regex libraries
in thread Regex libraries

Thanks

That is very interesting to know. Its good to know that presumably it wonīt affect me. Although reading the documentation I couldnīt get much out of it as I wasnt understanding the regexes itself.
Thanks for translating these to me in an understandable language :-)

While testing our software I ran into the mentioned bugs and falsely blamed Boost for that.

Its also interesting to see that Boost and PCRE have quite much in common. The author of Boost made also a statement, why he didnt stick to Perl5 regexes. He based his position on an article by Larry Wall, where Larry states that perl6 will probably have quite huge changes in the regex syntax and so Perl5 hasnt in fact a real standart. Sounds to me like Perl6 is reinventing regex!?

I commit I havent read the article completly yet but do you guys know if there /will be|is/ a book about Perl6 Regex syntax?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Regex libraries
by Anonymous Monk on Dec 30, 2004 at 17:49 UTC
    The author of Boost is quite right. Perl doesn't have a standard, and regexes in Perl6 will be different (although there's a promise Perl5 style regexes will work as well).

    Read about the Perl6 regexes in Apocalypse 5: Pattern Matching.

    There's no book about Perl6 regexes yet - but no doubt O'Reilly or some other publisher is willing to publish one as soon as someone can convince them they could write a good book about them. (Perl publishers will be very happy with Perl6 - it gives them the opportunity to sell their books again).

Re^5: Regex libraries
by eyepopslikeamosquito (Archbishop) on Dec 30, 2004 at 21:09 UTC