in reply to Re: (tye)Re: Efficient random hash stuff
in thread Efficient random hash stuff
Note that ([1,2],[3,4],[5,6],...) consumes quite a bit more memory (no, I haven't tested this) than ( [1,3,5,...], [2,4,6,...] ). I agree that this is less elegant, but if memory usage is a primary concern, then the elegance loss might be worth it.
- tye (but my friends call me "Tye")
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: (tye)Re2: Efficient random hash stuff
by japhy (Canon) on Nov 17, 2000 at 01:40 UTC |