in reply to Re^2: A call to keyboards: Better chatterbox wrapping
in thread A call to keyboards: Better chatterbox wrapping

I've updated again to correct that. Any other awkward cases that you know of?


Examine what is said, not who speaks.
Silence betokens consent.
Love the truth but pardon error.
  • Comment on Re^3: A call to keyboards: Better chatterbox wrapping

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: A call to keyboards: Better chatterbox wrapping
by demerphq (Chancellor) on Jan 10, 2005 at 16:30 UTC

    the only thing that occurs to me is that you seem to have mistaken URL encoded entities with HTML entities. HTML Entities look like: &#91; &#93; &lt; &gt; [ ] < >

    ---
    demerphq

      Your right, I used URI::Escape when I should have used HTML::Entities, and the difference does break the code, as it will break "e; just before the ; sometimes. I think this fixes that.

      Version 4(?)


      Examine what is said, not who speaks.
      Silence betokens consent.
      Love the truth but pardon error.