in reply to Re^5: Parrot Monks?
in thread Parrot Monks?
Questions about Perl6 are perfectly fine meditations in the current state of affairs.
I duly note that there's nothing in your reply talking about making filtering PM easier for the Perl6 experts anymore.
When I said “cool topics,” I wasn't talking about fads. Nor do I qualify Perl6 as a fad, in case you don't remember my stance.
But that doesn't mean anything about whether there should be a section any more than similar reasons meant there should be a CGI section or an XML section or a DBI or SQL section. Where'd you put a question like “how do I do X in Perl5 and how in Perl6” anyway?
Look at the structure of the current sections. We have one for (not so) simple questions; one for musings; a few places to post code; a place for meta-discussion about the site and community itself; for tutorials; for archived answers; etc. Do you see a pattern? They differ by the intent of root nodes, not by technology used — and that's exactly the right distinction. It would ill-advised for new sections to break from this scheme.
Makeshifts last the longest.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
| A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in. |