in reply to Re^5: Challenge: Mystery Word Puzzle
in thread Challenge: Mystery Word Puzzle

BrowserUk,
Sorry - see the 3rd assumption.
The number of letters in common is the exact number of unique letters in common. A 't' would only be counted once even if it existed twice in both the mystery word and the hint word I didn't finish the list as you can see you have a flaw in your code (which I am interested in seeing).

Cheers - L~R

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: Challenge: Mystery Word Puzzle
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 12, 2005 at 20:45 UTC
    ... you have a flaw in your code ...

    Not really. It's doing exactly what I thought the challenge required.

    Then I strongly suggest that you completely re-word the text of your challenge. Something along the lines of:

    The mystery word has exactly 2 unique letters in common with 'bumps'

    As the rules stand, with the details spread all over the place like that, it is very misinterpretable.

    As for my "code", it was originally a hand-coded single regex applied to all the 5 characters words in my words file.

    I had just finished writing a script to generate the regex from command line input of the form:

    P:\test>421692-1 5 bumps:2 seams:2 domes:3 shake:3 pokes:3 dukes:3 8 dukes house krems makes pokes smoke spade spoke

    When I read your reply that I was misinterpreting your spec. I'll have to take a look and see if it is adaptable to my new understanding of the rules.


    Examine what is said, not who speaks.
    Silence betokens consent.
    Love the truth but pardon error.
Re^7: Challenge: Mystery Word Puzzle
by wolfger (Deacon) on Jan 12, 2005 at 21:06 UTC
    # pokes has 3 letters in common with pokes

    *boggle*
    Count that again? ;-)


    --
    Linux, sci-fi, and Nat Torkington, all at Penguicon 3.0
    perl -e 'print(map(chr,(0x4a,0x41,0x50,0x48,0xa)))'