in reply to Perl is a post-modern aesthetic language

Trying to apply your personal stylish influence to Java, or (worse) to Python (which BTW is a wonderful language) IMHO just won't make sense...
This is pretty much flamebait. Python list-comprehensions, generators, and first-class functions make it very expressive. Now try to implement FP in Java and you are stuck with Anonymous Inner Classes to simulate Functors, which is infinitely worse than Perl/Python. You clearly haven't delved very deep into either of these too. While Python supports limited ways of rewriting the language, it is VERY expressive, and only a small notch down from Ruby.
  • Comment on Re: Perl is a post-modern aesthetic language

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Perl is a post-modern aesthetic language
by cosimo (Hermit) on Jan 17, 2005 at 15:28 UTC

    I was *not* saying that Python is not expressive. In fact, I think Python is really great, it has an overall code elegance that Perl does not have ({$#@}). Perl however, is far more sensitive to one's own personal style. In this sense it is more expressive.

    Sorry I didn't intend to flame Python or Java in any way. There's already too much language flames these days...