in reply to Re: Improving disclosure of quality for Catagorized Q&A Answers
in thread Improving disclosure of quality for Catagorized Q&A Answers
Personally I question the value of having Q&A work differently from the rest of the site. The section is probably best served by using the same internal structure (ie regular root nodes and notes like everywhere else), with a (configurably?) forced note depth of 1 when you look at the root node. Effectively that would work like the section does now: you see a question and only its direct answers. The major difference is that there would automatically be a some notes below your chosen depth indicator where there are replies to an answer.
Makeshifts last the longest.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: Improving disclosure of quality for Catagorized Q&A Answers
by ysth (Canon) on Jan 18, 2005 at 12:49 UTC | |
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Jan 18, 2005 at 13:17 UTC |