Re^6: Are lvalue methods (as properties) a good idea?

I can see that. How about you put it on CPAN as a developer release and never pull off the tag? Others might be more motivated to steal ideas if they have a working model.

Makeshifts last the longest.

Comment on Re^6: Are lvalue methods (as properties) a good idea?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: Are lvalue methods (as properties) a good idea? by fergal (Chaplain) on Jan 18, 2005 at 21:00 UTC
This was one of the reasonAlong time back on the module-authors list I suggested there should be an `ID` namespace on CPAN so that I could put this in `ID::FDALY::MethodMaker` [download] along with other interesting/useful stuff that I don't want to keep to myself but I also don't want to make the effort and turn into a fully documented and supported module. A kind of semi-private namespace. It was not well received.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^8: Are lvalue methods (as properties) a good idea? by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Jan 18, 2005 at 21:13 UTC
And I was one of those who argued against that. `:-)` But maybe we should have a `BlueSky::` TLNS… Makeshifts last the longest.	[reply]