in reply to Back to Perl
The only time this has ever failed me, oddly enough, was with Perl itself. Perl's syntax is opaque enough (is that the Holy War Alarm[tm] I hear in the background?) that I actually had to learn something of the language even to be able to read an existing application, much less modify it or write my own.
Good luck!
Mickey.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: Back to Perl
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Jan 21, 2005 at 12:26 UTC |