Indeed, I have tunnel vision here. After all, I was trying to show BrowserUk that type based validation is useful for cases where I want to validate the type of a value… while his vehemently argued position is that type based validation is a nightmare/useless/something like that.

In any case, thank you for a break in that circle. Yes, of course, state based validation is a different beast.

Makeshifts last the longest.